live live broadcasting social networking web2.0: live broadcasting streaming twit twitter Video webcam
by Anthony
leave a comment
Twitter + Live Broadcasting
I have written about a log of new streaming video tools on my previous blogs which can now be found under the category live broadcasting.
Two new sites launched this week taking that “conversational” approach to the next level using Twitter. Camtweet and Twitcam. Read more here.
The Justin.tv app Camtweet requires invites to participate in early testing, has a really ugly UI, and when has a chat room viewers sign into with thier Twitter ID/Password. When someone Tweets from your page, it includes a link to your show. Good idea! The rest of the site lacks any other bells or whistles.
TwitCam is powered by LiveStream (formerly Mogulus.com, I talked about in the Live Broadcasting 2.0 post) and works about the same. Log in with your Twitter cred, links and more… Plus a very pretty UI. I’m surprised however that LiveStream does not supply users with more tools or features that are in the full LiveStream accounts. For instance, the ability to play YouTube videos or show a ticker at the bottom of your screen (regular features on LiveStream). I am guessing that LiveStream is just trying to get users to broadcast first, but pulling in Twitter users and will move forward from there.
If there’s one think I’m surprised about… it’s that the TwitCam name isn’t already owned by King TWIT (This Week In Tech) Leo Laporte.
Live Broadcasting 2.0
There are many new and exciting things on the horizon for technology in education (see post on browser based virtual worlds) and none more exciting than the acceptance of live broadcasting (call it “Web 2.Live”). As you will see demonstrated below, there are several different sites available for live social interaction via webcam or desktop. Some specialize in the production of live content and each allows for recording and distribution of live recordings via embeddable players.
How can these tools be used in education? How is this different than simple video conferencing?
- Faculty, students, and other individuals (visiting lecturers, professionals, etc…) can interact from great distances while still having access to all media and desktop tools needed for dynamic discussions
- Recordings of these interactions can be documented and distributed asynchronously
- Like podcasting and video helped to create a culture of user-generated material so too might live media (there are many “live shows” already gaining popularity on these sites
- As mobile video becomes more mainstream, so too will live feeds of people’s lives: aka. Lifecasting
Below are a few sites I have chosen to feature. Each has a variety of similar or competing features. I have listed the pros and cons of each. Each video will also demonstrate some of the features. Since my interests also lie with Second Life, I was especially keen on the ability to publicly display a live feed of SL on the web. I have provided links to each site and also my profile or channel page. The only added software I am using beside the webservice is CamTwist for my Mac. It can be found here:
http://www.macupdate.com/info.php/id/24275/camtwist
http://www.stickam.com/anthonyfontana
Stickam.com Pros:
- Highly social: up to 6 other “live visitors” and unlimited chat/profile page viewers or visitors
- Easy to manage, record, embed recordings
- Autopilot for embedded player when not live (plays video, pictures, etc…) plays media on demand
Stickam.com Cons:
- Site is mostly used by teens at the moment
- Profile page features are limited
- Channel only page must be created elsewhere (see my live page at http://www.anthonyfontana.com/livebroadcast.aspx)
BlogTV demo for my blog - Broadcast your self LIVE
http://www.blogtv.com/People/AnthonyFontana
BlogTV Pros:
- Co-hosting – records/shows up to two people in live video screen
- Profile page modification tools are average (better than Stickam not as good as UStream)
BlogTV Cons:
- Too many ads – show up on profile page AND in embedded player!
- Video quality seems a bit lower than other sites
- Video cuts off bottom of screen (notice the ticker is cut in half!)
UStream.tv
http://www.ustream.tv/channel/anthony-fontana-live
UStream.TV Pros:
- Lots of options and features!
- Profile AND Channel pages that are highly modifiable
- Text overlays (not shown in video)
- Can port videos straight over to YouTube, Google, Vimeo and more
- Better for making a TV-like show
- Allows for co-hosting (I haven’t tested this yet)
UStream.TV Cons:
- Higher learning curve (as is the case whenever there are more features)
- Non-intuitive user interface – I didn’t like this one at first
- Not as social (seemingly)
- The Ustream player is set to auto-play… so hence the reason I posted the YouTube version of the video
http://www.mogulus.com/anthonyfontana
To play demo video:
- Click to turn player on (I have it set to off so that it doesn’t start every time the blog is loaded into a browser window)
- Wait for player to fully initialize (On Demand button will not show up immediately)
- Click on “On Demand” button on bottom of player
- Click on “new VOD Folder”
- Click on “Live Show Aug 1 2008″
Mogulus.com Pros:
- High quality production features built-in (ticker, splash pages, etc…)
- Auto-Pilot playlist for videos, photos, and pre-recorded shows (not enabled in above player)
- Graphical interface (GUI) is very easy to use, very intuitive
- Dynamic player allows for “Video on Demand” for viewers to peruse playlist
- Imports easily from YouTube (player can show other videos I’ve set to play including my machinima and even the UStream.tv piece from above.
Mogulus.com Cons:
- Not social – chat confined to viewers, but not creator (not in studio window at least)
- Ads – will come across bottom of screen (not as bad as BlogTV)
Please feel free to comment on this post. I’m very interested in hearing opinoins about live broadcasting.
Permalink:
http://themultichronicclassroom.blogspot.com/2008/08/live-broadcasting-20.html
Live Broadcasting 2.0
There are many new and exciting things on the horizon for technology in education (see post on browser based virtual worlds) and none more exciting than the acceptance of live broadcasting (call it “Web 2.Live”). As you will see demonstrated below, there are several different sites available for live social interaction via webcam or desktop. Some specialize in the production of live content and each allows for recording and distribution of live recordings via embeddable players.
How can these tools be used in education? How is this different than simple video conferencing?
- Faculty, students, and other individuals (visiting lecturers, professionals, etc…) can interact from great distances while still having access to all media and desktop tools needed for dynamic discussions
- Recordings of these interactions can be documented and distributed asynchronously
- Like podcasting and video helped to create a culture of user-generated material so too might live media (there are many “live shows” already gaining popularity on these sites
- As mobile video becomes more mainstream, so too will live feeds of people’s lives: aka. Lifecasting
Below are a few sites I have chosen to feature. Each has a variety of similar or competing features. I have listed the pros and cons of each. Each video will also demonstrate some of the features. Since my interests also lie with Second Life, I was especially keen on the ability to publicly display a live feed of SL on the web. I have provided links to each site and also my profile or channel page. The only added software I am using beside the webservice is CamTwist for my Mac. It can be found here:
http://www.macupdate.com/info.php/id/24275/camtwist
Stickam.com
http://www.stickam.com/anthonyfontana
Stickam.com Pros:
- Highly social: up to 6 other “live visitors” and unlimited chat/profile page viewers or visitors
- Easy to manage, record, embed recordings
- Autopilot for embedded player when not live (plays video, pictures, etc…) plays media on demand
Stickam.com Cons:
- Site is mostly used by teens at the moment
- Profile page features are limited
- Channel only page must be created elsewhere (see my live page at http://www.anthonyfontana.com/livebroadcast.aspx)
BlogTV demo for my blog - Broadcast your self LIVE
http://www.blogtv.com/People/AnthonyFontana
BlogTV Pros:
- Co-hosting – records/shows up to two people in live video screen
- Profile page modification tools are average (better than Stickam not as good as UStream)
BlogTV Cons:
- Too many ads – show up on profile page AND in embedded player!
- Video quality seems a bit lower than other sites
- Video cuts off bottom of screen (notice the ticker is cut in half!)
http://www.ustream.tv/channel/anthony-fontana-live
UStream.TV Pros:
- Lots of options and features!
- Profile AND Channel pages that are highly modifiable
- Text overlays (not shown in video)
- Can port videos straight over to YouTube, Google, Vimeo and more
- Better for making a TV-like show
- Allows for co-hosting (I haven’t tested this yet)
UStream.TV Cons:
- Higher learning curve (as is the case whenever there are more features)
- Non-intuitive user interface – I didn’t like this one at first
- Not as social (seemingly)
http://www.mogulus.com/anthonyfontana
To play demo video:
- Click to turn player on (I have it set to off so that it doesn’t start every time the blog is loaded into a browser window)
- Wait for player to fully initialize (On Demand button will not show up immediately)
- Click on “On Demand” button on bottom of player
- Click on “new VOD Folder”
- Click on “Live Show Aug 1 2008″
Mogulus.com Pros:
- High quality production features built-in (ticker, splash pages, etc…)
- Auto-Pilot playlist for videos, photos, and pre-recorded shows (not enabled in above player)
- Graphical interface (GUI) is very easy to use, very intuitive
- Dynamic player allows for “Video on Demand” for viewers to peruse playlist
- Imports easily from YouTube (player can show other videos I’ve set to play including my machinima and even the UStream.tv piece from above.
Mogulus.com Cons:
- Not social – chat confined to viewers, but not creator (not in studio window at least)
- Ads – will come across bottom of screen (not as bad as BlogTV)
Please feel free to comment on this post. I’m very interested in hearing opinoins about live broadcasting.
Permalink:
http://themultichronicclassroom.blogspot.com/2008/08/live-broadcasting-20.html
